Specialized AI Workflows with Claude Code Subagents

5 minute read

Claude Code Subagents

Last week, while exploring Claude Code’s latest features, I stumbled upon something that fundamentally changed how I think about AI assistance: subagents. Instead of having one general-purpose AI trying to handle everything from blog publishing to Terraform optimization, I could create specialized AI assistants—each with focused expertise and dedicated tools.

It’s like moving from having one overwhelmed generalist to a team of specialists who actually understand their domains. 🎯

🤖 What Are Claude Code Subagents?

Subagents are specialized AI assistants that operate within Claude Code, each designed for specific types of tasks. Think of them as expert consultants who:

  • Operate independently with their own context windows
  • Have specialized knowledge through custom system prompts
  • Use specific tools tailored to their expertise
  • Maintain focus on their designated problem domains

The key insight is context preservation. Instead of polluting your main conversation with detailed Jekyll build troubleshooting or Terraform optimization discussions, each subagent handles its specialty in isolation while returning focused results.

⚙️ Setting Up Your First Subagent

Getting started is surprisingly straightforward. Claude Code provides an intuitive interface through the /agents command: 💡

Claude Code Subagents

Agents Interface

The setup process guides you through three key decisions:

Creation Process

  1. Location: Project-level (.claude/agents/) or user-level (~/.claude/agents/)
  2. Creation method: Generate with Claude (recommended) or manual configuration
  3. Specialization: Define the subagent’s purpose, tools, and expertise

I recommend starting with Claude generation—it creates solid foundations you can then customize.

📝 Real-World Example: Blog Publishing Subagents

For my Jekyll-based blog, I created six specialized subagents that handle different aspects of the publishing workflow:

Content and Quality

  • blog-content-reviewer: Technical accuracy, SEO optimization, readability
  • seo-optimizer: Metadata, social sharing, search engine optimization

Technical Operations

  • jekyll-site-builder: Build processes, deployment, Docker configurations
  • medium-converter: Jekyll-to-Medium content conversion and formatting

Maintenance and Organization

  • i18n-sync: Bilingual content synchronization (English/Spanish)
  • asset-manager: Image optimization, unused file cleanup

Subagents Configuration

Each subagent has:

  • Focused tool access (only what they need)
  • Domain-specific prompts with detailed instructions
  • Proactive activation based on context recognition

For example, when I edit a blog post, the blog-content-reviewer automatically activates to check technical accuracy and SEO elements. When I have build issues, the jekyll-site-builder steps in with deployment expertise.

🏗️ Terraform Project Subagents

My most complex example comes from optimizing the terraform-aws-ecr module. This project needed specialized attention across multiple domains:

Infrastructure Specialization

  • terraform-module-optimizer: Code structure, resource organization
  • terraform-sre-architect: Monitoring, observability enhancements
  • terraform-security-auditor: Security reviews, compliance checking
  • terraform-cost-optimizer: Resource efficiency, cost management

🎭 The Coordination Challenge

Here’s where subagents reveal both their power and limitations. I created a comprehensive roadmap issue to coordinate the optimization effort:

Terraform Roadmap

Each phase has specific goals and dependencies:

Project Phases

The subagents helped create detailed task breakdowns and technical specifications, but coordination required human orchestration through the GitHub issue tracker.

✅ Parallel Execution Capabilities

✅ Concurrent Task Processing
Claude Code can run up to 10 tasks in parallel, processing them in batches. Perfect for independent subtasks across large codebases.

✅ Multiple Subagent Workflows
You can launch multiple subagents simultaneously—each with its own context window. For example: test writer + docs agent + performance optimizer working concurrently.

✅ Git Worktrees for Parallel Development
Run separate Claude Code sessions on different branches using Git worktrees, enabling true parallel development workflows.

❌ What Subagents Are NOT

It’s important to understand remaining limitations:

❌ They don’t automatically coordinate
Subagents don’t communicate with each other or share context between their specialized domains—you still need orchestration.

❌ They’re not a replacement for project management
Complex multi-phase projects still need human coordination and dependency management.

❌ Unlimited parallelism
Parallelism is capped at 10 concurrent tasks, and execution happens in batches rather than true streaming parallelism.

🎯 Coordinating Multiple Subagents

For complex projects requiring multiple subagents, I’ve found several effective coordination patterns:

GitHub Issue Coordination

Sequential Coordination (GitHub Issues)

The pattern:

  1. Create a master issue outlining the full project scope
  2. Break down phases with clear dependencies
  3. Use subagents sequentially for each specialized task
  4. Track progress through issue updates and checkboxes
  5. Link related issues to maintain project context

Parallel Coordination (Git Worktrees + Multiple Sessions)

Advanced pattern for independent workstreams:

  1. Create Git worktrees for different features/branches
  2. Launch parallel Claude Code sessions in each worktree
  3. Assign specialized subagents to each session
  4. Coordinate through pull requests and code reviews
  5. Merge completed work from parallel streams

Concurrent Processing (Single Session)

For related tasks that can run simultaneously:

  1. Launch multiple subagents using Task tool parallelism
  2. Assign complementary roles (writer + reviewer + optimizer)
  3. Monitor batch completion before next phase
  4. Consolidate results from parallel execution

These approaches leverage each subagent’s expertise while maintaining project coherence through explicit coordination.

💡 Best Practices I’ve Learned

When to Create Subagents

  • Repetitive specialized tasks (like blog content review)
  • Complex domain knowledge (Terraform optimization, security audits)
  • Multi-step workflows with consistent patterns
  • Tasks requiring specific tool combinations

Organization Tips

  • Use descriptive names that clearly indicate purpose
  • Limit tool access to only what each subagent needs
  • Version control project subagents for team collaboration
  • Document activation triggers in the description field

Tool Selection Strategy

# Example: Limited tool access for security-focused subagent
tools: Read, Grep, Bash
# Excludes Write, Edit to prevent accidental changes

🚀 The Subagent Advantage

After using subagents for a while, the benefits are clear:

🎯 Focused Expertise: Each subagent develops deep knowledge in its domain
🧹 Clean Contexts: Main conversations stay focused on high-level objectives
⚡ Efficient Workflows: Specialized tools and prompts speed up common tasks
🔄 Reusable Knowledge: Subagents work across projects and team members

The mental model shift is significant: instead of asking Claude to “do everything,” you’re building a team of AI specialists, each excellent at their particular job.

🎬 Getting Started

If you’re using Claude Code, try creating your first subagent this week: 🚀

  1. Start simple: Pick one repetitive task you do often
  2. Use Claude generation: Let it create the initial configuration
  3. Iterate and refine: Adjust tools and prompts based on actual usage
  4. Expand gradually: Add more subagents as you identify patterns

Subagents represent a evolution in how we work with AI—from general assistance to specialized expertise. For complex development workflows, they’re becoming indispensable. ⚡

📚 References

Leave a Comment